Monday, June 11, 2012

8 Misconceptions About Employment Background Checks: Survey Says!


Let’s face it.  The economy is still a mess and people aren’t finding jobs fast enough.  Given this fact, there are a lot of people looking to place the blame for these developments.  And has been the case for the last several years, many are focusing on employment screening and background checks.  I won’t say that all who oppose background check are flat out wrong in every instance, but all too frequently they rely on myths, misconceptions and urban legends to support their arguments.

Here is my list of the most commonly held misconceptions about employment background checks:

  • Background Checks Are the Reason Unemployment Rates Are High - We’ll remove all politics from this one and simply state that a large contributor to unemployment besides a slow economic recovery is that EMPLOYERS are having a difficult time finding qualified people for the jobs that are available.
  • Employers Use Background Checks As An Excuse Not to Hire Someone - As Bob Barker might say, “The Price is wrong.”  Remember, company’s spend an awful lot of time, money and effort to find the right candidate for the job.  Why would they go out of their way not to hire the people they have invested these efforts in?
  • Anyone with a Criminal Record Will Never Be Hired - As Alex Trebek might say, “Oh sorry!”.   There are over 65 million people with criminal records in this country.  If all of those people were out of work, unemployment rates would be 6 times higher than they are now. According to our 2012 Background Screening Trends study,  less than 10% of applicants with criminal records are denied employment.
  • Most Employers Pull All Applicant’s Reports - As Richard Dawson would say, “Survey says . . . buzzzz!”.  See SHRM study which reveals that only 13% of employers indicated they run credit on all applicants.
  • Employers Use Credit Score to Determine Employment Eligibility - As Pat Sajak would say, “‘Lose a Turn”‘ You were so close.”  Employers use what is referred to as an “Employment Credit Report” which does not include a credit score or account numbers.
  • Poor Credit Will Immediately Disqualify a Candidate - As Regis Philbin would say, “Is that your final answer?” If employers only hired people with good credit, they’d hardly be able to hire anyone.
  • Applicants Aren’t Give a Chance to Dispute Findings - As Simon Cowell would say, “Seriously, that was awful.” By law, employers must provide a consumer with a free copy of their background check and allow them up to 30 days to dispute the results.
  • Employers Demand Passwords to Candidates’ Social Networking Sites - As Burt Convy would say, “The password is ‘Incorrect’”. While this has been in the news as of late, you will be hard pressed to find anyone doing this.  And the backlash to employers that do this, is enough to discourage them for considering it.  Check out a story we posted about the city of Bozeman, MT
Guest post written by Nick Fishman, Chief Marketing Officer at EmployeeScreenIQ. Nick's postings on this site are his own and don't necessarily represent the opinions of HRmarketer or other staff members.

4 comments:

  1. I disagree. I was denied employment to a position I previously held based on my credit score alone.

    I have also become aware that drug testing is a money maker. I became curious when I saw how eagerly some were trying to push hair testing & was invited to join a linkedin group run by a person whose personal website talked about making money in encouraging drug testing.

    Gaining employment has become extremely difficult for a person who IS qualified but may have experienced hard times in their life.

    This is wrong & most who have not had to do much more than push paper for a living have no clue what working people are experiencing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous4:39 AM

    Nice article and good research about Employment Background Checks. It's good for security pint of view but i think the HR's have to first think about the quality then the background.
    Human Resource Program

    ReplyDelete
  3. Stop doing background checks, hire someone who shoots up the place and see how fast you'll get a negligent hiring lawsuit. Let's not forget why we started doing background checks in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Awesome article. Background checks really help company to assign a perfect candidate for the job. And also helps company to know more about the candidate like his behavior, nature, how he work and many other things which denotes that the person would be good for the job. :)

    ReplyDelete