Wednesday, April 23, 2008

Lead Acquisition Forms - When Enough is Enough.


I received a direct email today from a well known HR vendor promoting their new white paper. The title caught my attention - it was on a topic of great importance to me and relevant to what's going on in the marketplace. Score a win for the HR vendor.

So, I clicked the download button and was directed to their web site where I had to complete lead acquisition form. No problem. I don't mind giving away my contact information in exchange for useful content. Nor do HR buyers which is why direct email marketing with a content offer is so effective.

I then realized I had to actually give a correct email address because the white paper would be emailed to me. Smart move by the HR vendor. Score another win.

But then I took a look at the form. Wow - they want a lot of information from me. I was in a hurry so I quickly answered the questions and completed (so I thought) the form. When I hit submit, I was told I had missing information. In particular, I forgot to select my "Industry". This was required along with six other questions that I felt were none of their business. So I selected an industry and hit submit and again I am told I forgot something. Now I'm getting frustrated. Apparently, I forgot to check "Yes" to agree with the terms and conditions. Terms and conditions? This is a white paper!!! What do I need to agree to :-) And they actually tell me I should "take some time to review" the terms and conditions. Are you serious? All I want is to read the white paper.

So I bailed - I had to run to a meeting.

And my guess is some other people did the same, resulting in lost leads for this vendor.

I understand that HR vendors want lead acquisition functionality that allows for the efficient acquisition of lead data and that gets automatically integrated into their CRM. I also understand that in an ideal world, the vendor wants their lead acquisition form to acquire as much information as possible from the prospect in order to properly qualify the lead.

But not at the expense of the lead itself.

My suggestion is to capture - and require - the basics including name, title, company and email so you can follow-up with them at a future date. You may also want to ask for a phone number (although our own research shows HR buyers prefer to communicate via email with vendors) or mailing address and possibly one or two additional questions. But don't require that these other fields get completed. If the buyer is interested in your products or services they'll let you know.

Posted by Mark Willaman

3 comments:

J. William Tincup said...

Mark

I’ll go in a different direction than your post. I no longer believe in forms or CFRs in front of downloads. I prefer to give all the content away for free and without any data capture mechanism whatsoever. Mostly it’s a waste of time. Provide valuable content and a unique value proposition and let the prospect tell you that they are indeed interested in either more marketing (one opt in) and/or a sales person to connect with them (second opt in). Let the user drive. Let them decide how they want to be marketed to and/or sold to.

IMO, our job as marketers is to provide insightful content and make it easy – NOT hard for users to consume.

Just my opinion.

William

Starr Tincup
starrtincup.com, jpie.com

HR Marketer said...

William,

Fair point. In fact, a previous posting of mine (Should You Require Registration for Content Downloads?) touched upon this same topic. At HRmarketer, we recently made available all of our white papers without requiring a form to be completed. This has helped our SEO as all this publicly available content is now indexed by major search engines. And, our pipeline has not suffered. We now only require a form to be completed for our most current content offering. And, we actually disused today how we can shorten our lead acquisition forms.

Scott said...

Agree with William. This is about understanding the customer. How many people have saw the form you posted and decided not too bother??

Great blog Mark